(anyway) NO LIMITS TO PEOPLE
Dear Friends .. I'm back here, I'm back! poor I start writing this blog, which appears abandoned for some time now, since I arrived in Bali and this means that they are on holiday and so I have time to tell how much and what I see.
start by saying that the situation here is we just come in 'is truly tropical archipelago. L 'air is heavy with a' high humidity, but despite everything we breathe and in the evening in motion can get to do too cool (this will not affect many, but I hold to be specified).
The many hours of travel and a semi-stenuante waiting in Singapore always conditioned to -10, all in all made me appreciate the gust of warm damp (which took me directly to that in Shanghai in September 2008 when the first Once, I was exposed to the typical climate of the Asian cities). Everything makes me very happy and urges me to take full of the atmosphere that relaxes the mind and muscles.
In Singapore I also had the "pleasure" to know of the people, here a middle-aged lady in Paris to which I had to act as an interpreter in various situations and three girls from the Singapore Airlines crew that I was delightfully entertained during the 3 hour drive separating the two goals. The flight was really moved, because all the 'area was affected by a storm and I was sitting in the queue so that drinking a glass of' water or food to the mouth parts the company was a pretty tall order. Speaking of rest, yesterday during a tropical downpour around 8 in the evening I had my first shiatsu massage and it seems to me that now my circulation is better. I also have loose muscle that overlap for months that I have right shoulder. It was really a useful thing because after sitting many hours in positions I feel less absurd finalemte incriccato!
Monday, January 31, 2011
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Auction Fredericton New Brunswick
be a father. Relationship between parenthood and interpretation of Hawking's relativistic physics.
Blogspot is so determined to place this post in a wrong date. For this reason was duplicated in the correct date.
so please post them comments.
Having now reached the majority age of my daughter, I thought that I left behind the period of the awkward questions that have as their opening words "why" in favor of other, perhaps less embarrassing, but usually where a parent feels better prepared to respond and that, perhaps with fear, is preparing to face for years.
So the other night at dinner I was duly prepared to answer questions on love, peace in the universe, the exhaustion of stocks of petroleum and well also on sex, with little children when I innocently asked if I that there is other life intelligent universe, and if I believe you can travel in time?
I put up on how "mature father (but not too much) in front of naive daughter (but not too much) and I reply in order:
A) You think there is other intelligent life in the universe (and I quote pompously Margherita Hack)
B) I do not think you can travel in time.
I relax, down with the guard (on the other hand tonight I will not answer questions about love, sex and universal peace) e. .. SBAMMMMM ... I get the knockout blow.
"Why do not you think the theories of Stephen Hawking?"
falters, stammered something like "Stephen who?" I try to catch me on the ropes but the little child, glimpsed la possibilità di mettermi al tappeto non molla.
"ma si Stephen Hawking... Parli di fisica e non sai chi è Hawking?" (voce angelico accusatoria)
Dall'angolo mi viene in soccorso la mia compagna "a si non è quel fisico con problemi di disabilità che si occupa anche di astronomia" (voi non potete immaginare di quante risorse disponga un insegnate di danza). Per fortuna la cameriera suona il gong con la scusa di prendere le ordinazioni e io ne approfitto per riordinare le idee.
Chiarito di chi si sta parlando la discussione s'incentra su due punti
1-Stephen Hawking (se ho capito bene) non esclude l'esistenza di altra vita nell'universo. Non esclude nemmeno che l'universo abbia visto other intelligent life beyond our own. Believes it unlikely that intelligent life may exist at the same time in this universe. Not impossible but highly unlikely. Even more, it is unlikely, and there would be more appropriate to say, impossible, that these life forms could ever meet.
So far I get it. I can not share at all (but I'm just a poor father, he a great physicist ..) but I understand ...
2 - Stephen Hawking says he is convinced that we can travel in time, but only forward. To prove it is inspired by the famous example of astronauts leaving for a trip at relativistic speeds. On their return they discover that the earth for those left time passed more quickly and a father who left a young child, she discovers that now this is older than him.
Now my daughter tells me about a thought experiment proposed in a CNN documentary, and inspired by this idea of \u200b\u200bHawking. If you build a train that could travel at near the speed of light and a railroad which circumnavigates the globe, the passengers on that train could travel, for example for a week, starting from point A, turning several times around the earth, A decrease to the point and realize that in reality on the ground some years have passed. This is actually a time machine.
And here in front of my mind boggles the paradox. Although he knew the broad outline of the paradoxes of relativity and also that it proposes a truly escapes me.
Speed \u200b\u200bis relative to the observer. So if it is true that the train is moving relative to the earth at a speed close to that of light, it is also true for observers on the train, the earth is moving at that speed while the train rather than to stop them.
a result ... because the passage of time should slow down just for them? If the observers on the ground see the train slow down time, because there should not be the same effect for those off the train, look out the window events?
Who helps me to reaffirm my (benign) parental authority?
For those interested in the articles by Stephen Hawking, I can find some on his website:
http://www.hawking.org.uk/
Blogspot is so determined to place this post in a wrong date. For this reason was duplicated in the correct date.
so please post them comments.
Having now reached the majority age of my daughter, I thought that I left behind the period of the awkward questions that have as their opening words "why" in favor of other, perhaps less embarrassing, but usually where a parent feels better prepared to respond and that, perhaps with fear, is preparing to face for years.
So the other night at dinner I was duly prepared to answer questions on love, peace in the universe, the exhaustion of stocks of petroleum and well also on sex, with little children when I innocently asked if I that there is other life intelligent universe, and if I believe you can travel in time?
I put up on how "mature father (but not too much) in front of naive daughter (but not too much) and I reply in order:
A) You think there is other intelligent life in the universe (and I quote pompously Margherita Hack)
B) I do not think you can travel in time.
I relax, down with the guard (on the other hand tonight I will not answer questions about love, sex and universal peace) e. .. SBAMMMMM ... I get the knockout blow.
"Why do not you think the theories of Stephen Hawking?"
falters, stammered something like "Stephen who?" I try to catch me on the ropes but the little child, glimpsed la possibilità di mettermi al tappeto non molla.
"ma si Stephen Hawking... Parli di fisica e non sai chi è Hawking?" (voce angelico accusatoria)
Dall'angolo mi viene in soccorso la mia compagna "a si non è quel fisico con problemi di disabilità che si occupa anche di astronomia" (voi non potete immaginare di quante risorse disponga un insegnate di danza). Per fortuna la cameriera suona il gong con la scusa di prendere le ordinazioni e io ne approfitto per riordinare le idee.
Chiarito di chi si sta parlando la discussione s'incentra su due punti
1-Stephen Hawking (se ho capito bene) non esclude l'esistenza di altra vita nell'universo. Non esclude nemmeno che l'universo abbia visto other intelligent life beyond our own. Believes it unlikely that intelligent life may exist at the same time in this universe. Not impossible but highly unlikely. Even more, it is unlikely, and there would be more appropriate to say, impossible, that these life forms could ever meet.
So far I get it. I can not share at all (but I'm just a poor father, he a great physicist ..) but I understand ...
2 - Stephen Hawking says he is convinced that we can travel in time, but only forward. To prove it is inspired by the famous example of astronauts leaving for a trip at relativistic speeds. On their return they discover that the earth for those left time passed more quickly and a father who left a young child, she discovers that now this is older than him.
Now my daughter tells me about a thought experiment proposed in a CNN documentary, and inspired by this idea of \u200b\u200bHawking. If you build a train that could travel at near the speed of light and a railroad which circumnavigates the globe, the passengers on that train could travel, for example for a week, starting from point A, turning several times around the earth, A decrease to the point and realize that in reality on the ground some years have passed. This is actually a time machine.
And here in front of my mind boggles the paradox. Although he knew the broad outline of the paradoxes of relativity and also that it proposes a truly escapes me.
Speed \u200b\u200bis relative to the observer. So if it is true that the train is moving relative to the earth at a speed close to that of light, it is also true for observers on the train, the earth is moving at that speed while the train rather than to stop them.
a result ... because the passage of time should slow down just for them? If the observers on the ground see the train slow down time, because there should not be the same effect for those off the train, look out the window events?
Who helps me to reaffirm my (benign) parental authority?
For those interested in the articles by Stephen Hawking, I can find some on his website:
http://www.hawking.org.uk/
How Do I Get Software For Emerson Binoculars
flu and died. Now they say the plot?
will also be the fault of the sensationalist journalism, but in these day listings of deaths from influenza are almost daily.
On one side is the expected seasonal peak, on the other, as has been pointed out by the most authoritative voices than mine, link1, link2 , you are also paying tribute to the campaign against the vaccine conspiracy carried out by various .
E 'should be remembered as the campaign against vaccination had its foundation on anything that was not "paranoid crap."
plots based their accusations on research disproved for years now (squalene) and sometimes forged out of self- link to argue that France has organized "mass deportation" for those who refuse vaccination for themselves or for their children.
Any sane person with a solid contact with reality can tell what kind of crap it was.
Unfortunately in the world some people are weak, emotionally fragile, temporarily or permanently incapable of understanding the difference between the bales and the reality of the conspiracy, or are simply too ignorant to do so.
These are people who would need a sincere help and instead the conspiracy, masquerading as guilty individuals with understanding and tools to help them, guiding the hand towards a spiral of paranoia streets will worsen their situation.
In many cases you simply get the people who live with a partial dissociation from reality. People believe that everything that happens to them is guilty of some conspiracy or a system where other plot to be the only ones to enjoy certain privileges that they are instead denied.
In other cases, the paranoia instilled by conspiracy theorists, get to levels that promote self-injury, however unconsciously, to themselves or persone che si vorrebbe difendere.
Cosi si rinuncia a cure "scientifiche" (la scienza è marcia e complotta contro il mondo) per affidarsi a cure che non hanno nulla di scientifico ma appaiono più desiderabili. Chi non vorrebbe poter curare il cancro con i rimedi della nonna, piuttosto che con dolorose operazioni seguite da lunghe terapie debilitanti? Cosi, la vittima del complottista, non vaccinana i figli, convinto che la medicina non farà mai nulla di positivo per loro, ma anzi, che essa sia uno strumento di chi complotta per governare il mondo, per soggiogarci e controllarci e quindi, i vaccini uno strumento per inoculare a nostra insaputa un mezzo atto a condizionarci e spiarci.
Le morti di questi giorni sono solo in parte da attribuire normal seasonal influenza. They are also due to ignorance and fear spreaders.
Those looking for a little visibility and glory, they spread lies about vaccines, medicine and science, you will always carry around the shame caused by their actions.
Every other word is unnecessary. Nobody wants to waste too many adjectives to describe what is nothing more than a pile of dung.
PS anyone who has followed the story has in mind to which I refer to characters and items. Links to these articles have been deliberately omitted as well as the names of the authors, not because it is able to cite sources, but because it seems pointless give further publicity to them.
will also be the fault of the sensationalist journalism, but in these day listings of deaths from influenza are almost daily.
On one side is the expected seasonal peak, on the other, as has been pointed out by the most authoritative voices than mine, link1, link2 , you are also paying tribute to the campaign against the vaccine conspiracy carried out by various .
E 'should be remembered as the campaign against vaccination had its foundation on anything that was not "paranoid crap."
plots based their accusations on research disproved for years now (squalene) and sometimes forged out of self- link to argue that France has organized "mass deportation" for those who refuse vaccination for themselves or for their children.
Any sane person with a solid contact with reality can tell what kind of crap it was.
Unfortunately in the world some people are weak, emotionally fragile, temporarily or permanently incapable of understanding the difference between the bales and the reality of the conspiracy, or are simply too ignorant to do so.
These are people who would need a sincere help and instead the conspiracy, masquerading as guilty individuals with understanding and tools to help them, guiding the hand towards a spiral of paranoia streets will worsen their situation.
In many cases you simply get the people who live with a partial dissociation from reality. People believe that everything that happens to them is guilty of some conspiracy or a system where other plot to be the only ones to enjoy certain privileges that they are instead denied.
In other cases, the paranoia instilled by conspiracy theorists, get to levels that promote self-injury, however unconsciously, to themselves or persone che si vorrebbe difendere.
Cosi si rinuncia a cure "scientifiche" (la scienza è marcia e complotta contro il mondo) per affidarsi a cure che non hanno nulla di scientifico ma appaiono più desiderabili. Chi non vorrebbe poter curare il cancro con i rimedi della nonna, piuttosto che con dolorose operazioni seguite da lunghe terapie debilitanti? Cosi, la vittima del complottista, non vaccinana i figli, convinto che la medicina non farà mai nulla di positivo per loro, ma anzi, che essa sia uno strumento di chi complotta per governare il mondo, per soggiogarci e controllarci e quindi, i vaccini uno strumento per inoculare a nostra insaputa un mezzo atto a condizionarci e spiarci.
Le morti di questi giorni sono solo in parte da attribuire normal seasonal influenza. They are also due to ignorance and fear spreaders.
Those looking for a little visibility and glory, they spread lies about vaccines, medicine and science, you will always carry around the shame caused by their actions.
Every other word is unnecessary. Nobody wants to waste too many adjectives to describe what is nothing more than a pile of dung.
PS anyone who has followed the story has in mind to which I refer to characters and items. Links to these articles have been deliberately omitted as well as the names of the authors, not because it is able to cite sources, but because it seems pointless give further publicity to them.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Microsoft Wireless Mouse 0560
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Nightmare On Campus 4 Free Watch
Titles .. 27/12/2010
"dead birds falling from the sky ..."
This sentence states the title of this article (link to copy Straker Enemy) Conrad (lowercase intended).
Since I assume that is in the title in his mind it should be a news ...
Now I am no journalist but ... gosh! If dead birds continue to fly, that would be news. I think that those who died from falling normal trivially.
"dead birds falling from the sky ..."
This sentence states the title of this article (link to copy Straker Enemy) Conrad (lowercase intended).
Since I assume that is in the title in his mind it should be a news ...
Now I am no journalist but ... gosh! If dead birds continue to fly, that would be news. I think that those who died from falling normal trivially.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)